Showing posts with label myspace. Show all posts
Showing posts with label myspace. Show all posts
Tuesday, December 14

postheadericon Tila on CNN Online



So the CNN "interview" (which means Tila rambling on in qualities like an iReport on Skype) has been posted up to the interwebz today. What irritates me when her stuff gets posted, is that anyone who gives the authorization to do so, doesn't fact check whatsoever. Video will be at the bottom, quotes are the direct transcript as posted. As always, sectioned out and my thoughts will follow.

Onto the CNN video:
Hi everyone! I'm Miss Tila and I'm gonna have a little chat with you guys about online privacy, so *meth smack* take some notes.
Uhh.... this statement is quite misleading. I thought it was going to be about how to show your twat to kids, put up videos that get taken down, show everyone how to fall off a chair pretending to strip, pose for paps in a tree and put up public videos and rants against every man for all being the baby daddy. I was wrong! BTW, all the (sic) in there, is her words, not typo's from me. It's exactly how she said it, even if it doesn't make sense.

CNN Montage of all the people knocking her on their respective shows.
I actually started WAY before social media was even, ya know, a thought. *giggle* I actually built my own website (Hotspot). I started it when I was 19, next thing to make a long story short - which everyone knows the story - then I got really huge on MySpace, I was actually in the Guiness Book of Records for having the most friended person on a social network.
Okay, so the first snippet, in all it's rambling incoherent glory. So she started before social media was a thought? Gee, I guess I missed the rewriting of the internet history back in the days of AOL profiles, Geocities, Friendster, etc. Okay, so she was "discovered" at 17 and has claimed her infamy as young as 18, but didn't start until she was 19 with her own site, which THEN led to MySpace? Umm... MySpace didn't start (in a very limited format) until 2003 and not a full social site with profiles until 2004. Tila was 22. She'd have then had her site for at least 3 full years, admitting it's failure apparently. She was in the GBWR for all of a minute too. I know it was in the online edition, I don't do print, but possibly for 2006 (since Tom would have been friended more than her upon MySpaces opening) maybe made it into a print edition. Dunno.

I love the claims of how "she" built her website. Considering she's about as dumb as a box of fucking rocks, and after 9 years apparently cannot create her own damn blog, which as of yet, still hasn't changed since her first saying in August, then again in early November that she was revamping it. Apparently, the "freelance" choreographer/writer/blogger/widget writer/twenty other things with no job that she has hired can't get it together.
But, ummm, I've realized is, is a lot of pros and cons to being on the internet. But I just happen to be a celebrity or whatever, but just, at the same time, ya know, a celebrity that a frie-I'm friends with everybody else, and they feel like "Oh, Tila's my friend, ya know, we're friends". And sometimes they can become *meth smack* delusional with that and then they feel like they own me, and it's just dangerous, just I- I can't trust anybody anymore.
She likes to keep calling herself a celebrity. Most sites call her a Z-lister, pseudo-celeb or flat out celebutard. Reminds me of a TV show where someone keeps repeating what they want someone to call them, so that it becomes true. Now all you bitches bow the fuck down and start calling me Princess Seola. That way, I'll become one. I wish the Tila Army 12 would see through the fucking glass window with this one. Not only has she insulted them numerous times about their stupidity, but here again, to their face, Tila is always saying "I'm cool with my Army, they love me and I love them..." and "tell me another celeb who's so cool and close with her fans that we are all friends". While she rambles on about them becoming delusional, maybe, it's because of the fact that she constantly promises them something, falsely lies about bringing them to her house or taking them shopping. These poor souls actually have no maturity to believe she's lying to them - they aren't delusional, just trusting. Too bad that 100 incidents to cause mistrust doesn't come across to them. She can't even "trust" her "delusional" fans anymore. What a sad world.
Let's say I'll tweet like "Oh, I'm gonna go eat a hot dog" and then there's a picture of me posting (sic) up eating a hamburger and they're so obsessed that they're (sic) be like "She's a patho(go)logical liar" she said "you're eating a hot dog, but there's a photo of a paparazzi who shot you eating a hamburger, you're a liar", and it's like oh my god, and it's just like, it - it's crazy and I think it's because I am too assessable (sic) and I think that I, um, need a plan to still keep in touch with my fans, but have a, you know, a-a, a line that I draw where I'm not too assessable (sic), even me I need to realize, I used to tweet all the time, like I'm heading to this and that, I'm heading to the gas station, blah blah blah and then like, people would pop up, ya know, and -and it's dangerous and so for even regular people they should be really careful about what they say or where they are going because you never know people out there, that you don't know - everything that's private to you, meaning your safety, keep that off the internet... keep that off the internet.
I wanted to break this up, but it was all a run on sentence and I couldn't get a good spot. She really and truly said this, verbatim - all the rambling, all the words that either don't exist or make sense.... Okay, so first off - no one cares about the piddly bullshit about hamburgers versus hot dogs if that were to actually happen. Let's get to semantics though - saying you are having one thing and then having something else is technically still a lie. If she can compare the callousness of the actual lies we caught her in, as being as silly as food - it really shows how little she thinks of the lives she hurts and the people caught in the cross hairs of her stupidity.

Tila isn't exactly ACCESSIBLE - yes Tila, that's the correct word. Assessable is for people in a... *light bulb and rainbows go off about Seola's head* psychiatric ward. (As in, is the patient assessable or too mentally out of it to be assessed.) Anyways, anyone who even posts or Tweets to Tila is under threat of Tila constantly saying she's going to file a lawsuit and call the cops and we are all stalkers. One poor dude (as evidenced in a blog here previously) who walked around her old neighborhood for years was even called on by Tila. When she had her garbage sale, a whole 20 people showing up, of which we know at least 5 were haters. Yeah, she was there, she was "assessable" and no one even bothered when it was free and legal to do so, let alone actually access her in any way.

Now, Tila tweeted when she did the blurb for CNN.December 7th. Oh, she's gonna be soooooo private. Oops... what's this?That would be Tila, on December 10th, tweeting where she's going! You pathogological liar! I guess us "regular people"don't need to Tweet spots we are going TO GET THE FUCKING PAPARAZZI TO SHOW UP. Especially since we weren't planning photo ops with tired ass musicians (you know, like Kid Rock...'s impersonator) who can't get paps to chase him either. Since that interview, aside from the tweet on where she's going, she put up yet another video... while still crying over privacy.




Now all that said, a tangent - I've stumbled across something - did you know Tila has a lazy eye? Yes, it's true! I've been perusing old videos of her, before she went too hardcore druggie, she had a slight lazy eye. In certain videos of this past year, it's become more noticeable and as of late, is extremely noticeable, at least to me. My hubs busted his eye on a gravestone (long story) when he was a kid, so he has one by injury (and truly no notice except when he looks extreme left). When he has taken medication for post surgery and such, his muscle control is lowered, making it insanely noticeable. All the shit Tila is on, is actually making it much more easy to tell when she's high as a muthafucking kite. Her eyes shift faster because of the drugs, but it also makes the eye exaggerated in movements. Check for yourself!

Here is Tila, right before Tampongate last year - pay attention to HER left eye, as to the viewers the eye on the right. Quite subtle, but still there.


Now, this video from a couple days ago. Pay attention to the eyes, bitch can look in two directions at once because she's soooo stoned her muscle function is impaired.


Again, evidenced somewhat in the CNN video, but obviously, she wasn't nearly as high because it was under a bit more control. What do you all think?
Wednesday, December 1

postheadericon Tila and MySpace - Myth or Fact?


Every month or so, someone comes across another post, comment or whatever, somewhere on the net claiming to be the reason Tila is famous. Why anyone would actually want to cop to any part of her fame is beyond me, but eh, it happens. I'm here with this post to show the truth, once and for all. The most recent I have seen is not just someone who claims to know someone but rather someone who claims to be the "real McCoy". This tool Gerard Spinks is publishing that he is now the engineer behind the scenes. I'll break down this particular post first.

It was yesteryear circa 2005. Seems a mighty long time ago, I know. In 2010, things move at the speed of light even in a dull economy. Myspace was the new new and as an engineer and marketer, I was all over it. I have been developing marketing systems for quite some time now over the Internet so I saw Myspace as another potential avenue to market products and services.
MySpace wasn't "new new". It had been in operation since 2003 as a storage site. In 2004, it transitioned to the site you know today. My account is from 2004 and let me tell you, I'm not one to latch onto social media. Aside from that, claiming to see the "potential" in marketing when MySpace had those damn ad leeches from the start is about as egotistical as one gets.

I was sitting around my house chillin in Atlanta and cruising around Myspace. I had like 25 friends and somehow I click on a girl named Tila Tequila who had like 125 friends which was a lot back then. As people on Myspace did, we started talking. Her pictures on her Myspace were full frontal nudity and held nothing back.

Always into marketing, I hit her up on the email and asked her what was her plan to market herself. It looked like she was already doing a great job but I didn’t quite think the full on nudity was working for her. In a series of emails, we begin to discuss how best to market herself and her music. She shared
that she really wanted to be an artist. I shared with her that she should try and get corporate sponsors as she attempted to grow her brand.
This is quite "valley girl" so to speak. I don't know many engineers who speak in street slang, but I digress, I'm sure there is a few. I'm sure dude just randomly clicked to chat and just "stumbled" across the nudity. Now, this dude is claiming 2005 she only had 125 friends. This was after she was in Playboy and a bunch of no name stuffs. Now, even I had 125 friends quickly when everyone was friending everyone. However, this capture from the WayBack Machine (the uberest site on the internet for prior caching of webpages) on August 10, 2004, Tila already had 36,000 friends.Over time, as you can see in this search engine query, it took her quite a while, but each date brings her numbers higher.
  • August 10, 2004: 36,000
  • November 13, 2004: 68, 000
  • January 15, 2005: 111,000
  • February 11, 2005: 135,000
  • April 12, 2005: 212,000
And so on and so on. There's more dates in between and more after. You can see though, it was a gradual incline. Through these two years, she was promoting her MySpace in various off market mags and the cybergirl crap. What else is ironic, in those very pages, she actually specifically states she's not interested in the advertising crap.
After chopping it up for a few weeks, I tell her that as an engineer I found a way to build an automated robot to get Myspace friends quickly without ever being on the site. I told her that I tested it but Myspace had a limit of how many friend requests you could do in one day of around 100 or so. Tila Tequila then drops a bomb on me and tells me that she has an engineer friend at Myspace who worked in Southern California. This friend could take most of Tom’s original friends in the database and transfer the database files to hers. She asked me if I thought she should do it.
Okay, likelihood that not only would an engineer just magically find a person with 125 friends "accidentally", and the likelihood that Tila would respond, and the likelihood that she actually knew anyone at MySpace who is an engineer is about -892%.

Without hesitation, I said hells to the yea. No joke, on a Friday night Tila Tequila had around 200 friends. On Monday, she had over 250,000 friends and this launched her into the Internet star that she became. I then told her to reach out to Cingular Wireless and they would see her numbers and sponsor her just on numbers alone. They did. The engineer who helped her did one more database transfer and gave her another 250,000 friends which then made her seem like an overnight success which in the United States, turns you into an immediate media darling. She then turned viral. Because she had so many friends, other people would friend request her just to be down and try to leave comments on her front page. The rest is history.
Without hesitation? You mean, without thinking about the law? So "no joke", at no point in 2005 did Tila ever have 200 friends. She had well over that as pervy dudes couldn't wait to get their rocks off at nudies on MySpace for free. This douche is also trying to take credit for making her an "internet star" when she'd already been around on the net for a couple years hocking her beef curtains. But she never "turned viral". She was always viral - the free clinic in LA can confirm that.

Now, factoid and internet archives aside, the legal aspect.

Not only did Tila and this supposed engineer use the internet to set up (since he was in Atlanta) interstate internet fraud and hacking, but the engineer at MySpace also breaking the law by divulging and giving away coding (as that engineer apparently couldn't do it and had to give the info across state lines to some dude he didn't know in Atlanta) to a person he couldn't trust, but that no one, not a single person would notice the overload of data over a weekend by transfer? Come on. Anytime any engineer accesses... I wanna say data mainframe, but that's not right... anyway, accesses a secure network (and since MySpace stored personal account info, would have been required to do so), their ID is stamped onto everything. This is one of the reasons. So the massive data transfer would have set off alarms in the first place, someone would have checked to see what was up and most likely checked internal logs since the data coming in would have been corporate information.

Each person that passes this story off as their own is admitting to fraud, data hacking, terms of service violations, interstate internet fraud for not only themselves, but Tila and the "engineer at MySpace". All that aside, the dude that is claiming it this time can't even do simple coding on his OWN site!
Wednesday, August 25

postheadericon Tila's Myspace Friends


We've gotten a lot of comments since our friends over at Ghost Rider Radio posted this entry about Tila.  You guys have been asking us to report on it.  There's nothing new we can really add to it, so I urge you to go check out their entry (and the rest of their blog, too).  Anyway, I'll touch on it briefly.

GRR introduces a screen cap they found via Queen_LaQueefa (who is fucking hilarious) by saying it was
written by an unknown guy, going by the name of admin, on the website owned by Gerard Spinks Publishing, LLC.
And here's the screen cap:

Ghost Rider Radio continues by breaking this down, step by step.  It's really interesting.

In any case, there's no proof of this being factual.  Did it happen?  I'd guess yes, it probably did.  It wouldn't surprise me in the least.  Do we know for sure?  No.  So I suggest we all keep this in the back of our minds until more proof comes up.  But it's a good read and definitely an interesting (and probable) theory.



Writers